About

Showing posts with label Tribal Women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tribal Women. Show all posts

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Women and Conflict in Al-Jawf- Case Studies


Case Studies on Women and Conflict in Tribal Yemen
Al-Jawf
Nadwa Al-Dawsari
April 19, 2014

Introduction:
Women in tribal areas in Yemen are often portrayed in the mainstream media as weak, voiceless and victims of tribal traditions that suppress and discriminate against them. Very little effort has been done to explore the role women play and the influence they have on their communities, particularly in relation to conflict. An assessment that was conducted by Partners Yemen demonstrated that women are not always passive actors in conflict, but can play roles as instigators of conflict or peacemakers. Many women are active in resolving conflicts within their families and communities, and on rare occasions respected older women may intervene in violent disputes. The Partners’ assessment concluded that women’s role in conflict can be significant, both exacerbating and mitigating conflict[1].

The following case studies will examine the role of women in peacemaking in Aljawf governorate through the stories and experience of some local women leaders. The purpose of this exercise is to trigger questions and analyses that would hopefully inspire programs that could enhance the role of women in conflict resolution and peacebuilding in tribal areas in Yemen.

Background:
With a population of about 577,000, Aljwaf is one of the 21 governorates of Yemen located in Northeast of the capital city of Sanaa. With twelve districts, it extends over the Empty Quarter to the boarders with Saudi Arabia and occupies about 7.2% of Yemen’s land. It is one of the poorest and most isolated areas in the country where, according to the 2007 Yemen Poverty Assessment, between 40 and 60 percent of the population are poor.[2]In addition, over 83% of the local population are illiterate.[3] Those who visit Aljawf describe it as an area that still lives in the stone ages. The main urban center in the governorate, Alhazm, for example doesn’t have any hotels or restaurants. People still rely almost exclusively on grazing and agriculture for income. 

Aljawf is among the Northern governorates that have strong tribal traditions.  Tribal Customary law is the main system that handles disputes. However, increase in conflicts and lack of development among other factors put the system under tremendous stress. Corruption, poverty, unemployment, competition over water and resources, as well as a lack of resources for education and a shortage of teachers were named as some of the root causes of conflict in the community[4]. In some areas, tribal conflicts caused the closure of schools and hence deprived students of education for many years.[5] In recent years, the governorate witnessed violent clashes between local tribes and Huthi rebels.[6] There are no functioning courts in the governorates and the only two courts are limited to notarizing marriage certificates and other paper work.[7]  The absence of a robust formal judicial system and the erosion of existing tribal conflict resolution traditions led to an increase in conflict which embedded most development efforts in the governorate.

Women and Conflict:
Unlike the perception, women in Aljawf do have influence over decisions that affect their lives such as marriage and divorce. A girl’s consent is necessary before marriage. Culturally it is not only acceptable but common for a woman to leave her husband if she so chooses, and her family and tribe will usually support her decision. A man who holds his wife against her will be accused of committing a “black shame” among tribes.  “It is very normal in al-Jawf. If a woman doesn’t want a man anymore, she can simply dump him”, said Sayyedah Alghanemyah, a prominent female tribal leader in Aljawf[8]. Although the culture has been influenced by conservative religious education imported from Saudi Arabia over the past two decades, most women seem to still enjoy respect and influence in their communities.

Evidence show that women play a role, both negative and positive, in conflicts. Women sometimes instigate conflicts by pushing their male relatives to take revenge. “They will talk” is a local saying in Mareb indicating that a man will be the focus of women’s gossip if he fails to take revenge and as a consequence he will be labeled a “dishonorable” man. However, women seem to be more actively involved in resolving conflicts than in instigating them. Although women do not take the position of direct mediators or arbitrators, they are sometimes able to influence tribal leaders who carry that responsibility as well as the parties to the conflict or those who have influence over them.

Through leveraging tribal rules that give women access, protection, influence and respect, some women managed to mitigate violent conflicts. A woman can influence an arbitration process by cutting a piece of her hair and taking it to the arbitrator. This is an indication that she has a demand and a good arbitrator and tribesman would honor the demand of a woman in that context.
In tribal traditions, it is considered a “black shame” to harm a woman or a man who is accompanying a woman; hence, women have an ability to move in and out of conflict zones without being targeted. If harmed, the blood money of a woman can be up to forty-four times the blood money of a man. Because of this women often play a role in providing supplies and in some cases they have evacuated injured fighters.

Case Study 1: Fatima ended a family dispute:

Context:
A misunderstanding between Ali Mejwer and his brother Mohammed Mejwer had escalated to the extent that Ali had abandoned his tribe and sought refuge with another tribe. It is said that there was no particular cause for the dispute but that it was caused by women with their gossip and encouragement of hostilities between the two brothers. The fracture in the family relationship went beyond just the two brothers. Ali’s son, Saleh, was married to Mohammed’s daughter and had 5 children with her. The relationship was prone to problems and members of the tribe thought it was likely to break up if the conflict between the parents continued. The young couple had already begun to argue because of it.

In Aljwaf and in tribal areas, family ties are very important and so it was unusual to see family members breaking apart like this. Family members usually live in the same community, if not the same house. Family and tribal ties are critical to the solidarity and union of the tribe and hence its status and influence among other tribes. Many prominent men quickly intervened to try to resolve the conflict, but with no luck.

Intervention:
Fatima Muhsen, early 50s, is Ali’s ex-wife and Saleh’s mother.  She was alarmed by the developing dispute between the two brothers. Her son told her that things had reached a dead-end with his father who refused any mediation to reconcile with his brother. Fatima knew that if the situation continued to escalate it would affect her son’s marriage so she decided to do something about it.

Fatima didn’t want to go to Ali before making sure Mohammed was on board for a solution to the conflict. Mohammed agreed that he would be happy to welcome his brother back to the family and reconcile with him. After that Fatima, along with Saleh, visited Ali in his new home. “I came to you tallabah with a demand. I swear I am not leaving your house until you agree to reconcile with your brother and go back to your home”, said Fatima. What Fatima said is an expression used in tribal areas that speaks to tribal values of generosity, hospitality and honor. An honorable tribesman should honor the request of his guest especially if that guest is a woman. In this case it was Ali’s ex wife and the mother of his son. To forgive and compromise is considered an important demonstration of hospitality. “You are so precious. I would give away all my children[9]”, said Ali, an expression that indicates that he was honoring Fatima’s demand at any cost. Fatima then sent her son to bring Mohammed to Ali’s house. The two brothers reconciled in her presence and Ali moved back to his original home with his tribe. Because of her intervention, the conflict was resolved after about one and half years of dispute.

Fatima has a long experience in resolving family and community conflicts. She leveraged on the privileges that tribal traditions give to guests and women and utilized that to put pressure on Ali to end the dispute with his brother and convince him to return to his home tribe. The fact that she is related to the men and that she is the mother of Ali’s son gave her an additional influence.

Case Study 2: Aaliah stopped violent clashes between tribes and government forces: 
Context:
In 1998, there was a conflict between the government and the Aljedaan tribe. The Aljedaan tribal area extends from Mareb governorate to the boarders of Aljawf governorate. Armed clashes erupted between government forces and the Aljedaan tribesmen.[10]  A military backup was sent from Alhazm, the main town in Alajwf, to help the government forces. As the backup convoy passed by Arrawdh town, some armed men from Arrawdh fired bullets into the air. The soldiers in the military convoy who did not know much about the geography of the tribes there thought the Aljedaan were trying to ambush them and as a response they fired back not only with guns but with heavy weapons at Arrawdh. Tribesmen fired back killing two soldiers and the clashes intensified.

Intervention:
Aaliah Ali Khaled Ben Shutaif, is an older woman in her tribe, the Alfuqman of Arrawdh town in Aljawf. Aaliah was known for her courage.  She descends from a well-known sheikhly family and she is the sister of Mohammed ben Khaled ben Shutaif, a tribal leader respected not only in Aljawf but also in all tribal areas in Yemen. “She used to ride horses and she has a sword”, said her nephew Ali Alajji.
When clashes between Alfoqman and government forces intensified, she decided to do something about it. Aaliah went to the conflict zone to stop the clashes. Tribesmen from her town tribe tried to stop her but she was determined.  Carrying a bottle of water, she walked towards the soldiers. Her tribesmen had to stop firing because they were afraid they might shoot her by mistake. Government forces also stopped firing because they saw a woman coming towards them. She offered water to the soldiers. “My sons, there is a mistake here”, she said to the soldiers. She explained to the soldiers that the few bullets that were shot in the air and triggered the clashes were not aimed at attacking the soldiers. She told them that it is not Aljedaan tribesmen who are firing but rather Alfuqman tribesmen and that Alfuqman tribesmen fired back because the soldiers attacked them.

Aaliah discovered that two soldiers were already killed. She spoke to the other soldiers and convinced them that she would stop her men from firing and that Alfuqman sheikhs would deal with the problem of the soldiers who were killed once the clashes stopped. She went back to her tribesmen and told them to stop firing at the soldiers. “They have two casualties. We have to fix this”, she told her tribesmen.
Aaliah’s effort helped eliminate the misunderstanding about the situation which led to the violence. She also managed to stop the violent clashes and open a window for tribal mediation. The situation would very likely have escalated with more people killed had Aaliah not intervened.

Aaliah took advantage of the protection that tribal tradition extends to women during conflict. Her descent from a prominent sheikhly family also gave her more leverage over her tribesmen which she used.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case Study 3: Wardah and Fatima lead an effort to prevent a tribal conflict:  

Context:
In 2010, President Saleh allocated a monthly stipend to the sheikhs of Alajji family to show appreciation for their efforts to facilitate government work and guarantee government vehicles safety on the main road.[11]

The Aal Atiq subtribe were upset that the president did not allocate a similar stipend for them or at least a share of the Aal Alajji’s stipend. To pressure the government, they started blocking the main road to prevent any government vehicle or group from entering the governorate. They even appointed their own sheikhs and announced that they were rejecting the leadership of Sheikh Mohammed Alajji, who is the sheikh of the area. The situation intensified and tension started building. A group of influential tribal leaders from the area tried to intervene to convince Aal Atiq to lift the checkpoint that blocked the main road but with no luck.

Intervention:
Fatima Shajerah and Wardah Mejwer are two women who took part in the leadership program on conflict-sensitive development organized by Partners Yemen in 2010. During the program they learned conflict management and mediation skills to complement traditional skills. As part of the program, they were to conduct similar trainings for local leaders in their areas. The road block by Aal Atiq tribesmen started while they were preparing for the local trainings. Fatima, who originally comes from Mareb, didn’t like seeing the road block every time she travelled to Aljawf. The two women decided to do something about this conflict. They knew they had no chance to do anything directly but they were also aware that they could mobilize certain individuals who have influence and who could potentially resolve the situation. The two women intentionally included some men from Aal Atiq and other influential local leaders in the training. Abdullah ben Ali Atiq, from Aal Atiq, took part in the training and shared some of his personal experience in conflict resolution with others.

Fatima and Wardah took a two-way approach to this; Fatima had a conversation with Abdullah Atiq to try to convince his tribesmen to end the roadblock. On the other hand, Wardah talked to Hamad Shutaif, a local leader and local council member who also took part in the training, to encourage him to intervene to resolve the problem. As a local council member, Shutaif had good access to the governor’s office. He led an effort with some local leaders and met with the governor. Simultaneously, Abdullah Atiq who was very eager to engage in conflict resolution after the training, managed to convince leaders from his subtribe to agree to the mediation effort led by Shutaif. Negotiations took place in the presence of the governor of Aljawf who promised to allocate some jobs for the Aal Atiq family and that ended the road blockage.

Both Fatima and Wardah took advantage of being in the public sphere and used some social and political influence techniques to bring different actors who they thought could influence the main conflict parties, Aal Atiq and the government. First, they identified the conflict party that is causing the conflict, Aal Atiq. Then they targeted one of the influential men in Aal Atiq in the training and worked with him to influence his tribesmen. At the same time, they also identified and approach a local council member who they knew had the potential to initiate a negotiation process with Aal Atiq and resolve the conflict.


Conclusion:

These case studies illustrate the fact that, contrary to the perception, women can play a significant role in conflict. The question remaining is how this understanding can be reflected in conflict programming that targets tribal areas in Yemen? How can conflict resolution practitioners approach the issue of integrating women’s role in conflict resolution activities while remaining sensitive to the social and cultural dynamics? Women can work to facilitate and advocate for peace. They can mobilize and put pressure on men and community leaders to address existing conflicts. In addition, they can raise awareness about the devastating impact of conflict on development. While an in depth assessment is needed to come up with viable options to include women in conflict resolution and development programs in general, a first step would be to engage them in the design and implementation of these programs.



References:
·      Email interview with Ali Saeed, local civil society leader from Aljawf, July 9, 2013
  • Interview with Sheikh Ali Alajji, governorate council member in Aljawf, Sanaa, January 20, 2012, Sanaa.
  • Group interview with women involved in resolving conflicts in Alkhalaq district, October 29,2011, Aljawf.
  • Interview with Fatima Muhsen, female elder who is involved in resolving conflicts in her community, October 29, 2011, Aljawf.
  • Interview with Sayyedah Alghanemiyah, female tribal leader, November, 2009, ALajwf



[1] PDCI and Partner Yemen, 2011, “Conflict assessment: Mareb, Aljawf, Shabwa and Albaidha”. 
[2] See “Yemen Poverty Assessment”, The Government of Yemen, The World Bank and The United Nations Development Program, 2007, http://www.undp.org.ye/reports/Volume_I_Main_Report.pdf
[3] Government of Yemen, Ministry of Education Adult Literacy Program, 2009, National report. Can be found at http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/INSTITUTES/UIL/confintea/pdf/National_Reports/Arab%20States/Yemen.pdf
[4] PDCI and Partner Yemen, 2011, “Conflict assessment: Mareb, Aljawf, Shabwa and Albaidha”. 
[5] “Interview with Abdulhameed Aamer”, Marebpress-Arabic, 2008 http://marebpress.net/mobile/articles.php?id=3709&lng=arabic
[6] Huthis is a Shiite rebel group that revolted against President Saleh regime in 2004 and subsequently the government launched 6 wars against them between 2004 and 2010.
[7] Email interview with Ali Saeed, July 9, 2013
[8] An interview the author did with Sayyedah Alghanemiyah, 2009. Female leaders
[9] عليتي اجيب عيالي كلهم
[10] This paper is not concerned with the details of the conflict between Aljedaan and the government.
[11] Although this allocation was outside the formal system, it was a common practice by the government to reward tribal leaders who protect government interests in the area.

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Tribal Conflicts through the eyes of a Woman



A story of tribal conflict as told by a female Tribal leader
02.04.2008

Tribal conflicts constitute the biggest challenge not only to development and democracy but also to stability in Yemen. In the eastern governorate of Al-Jawf, conflict extends its damage to all aspects of life and has kept the governorate isolated from the rest of the country and deprived people there from basic development services and efforts until today[1]. Except for the main paved road that runs across main “towns” and the few cars driving on the road, everything else in the governorate takes you hundreds of years back in time.
One of the most violent and complicated conflicts in al-Jawf is the one between the Hamdan and Shulan tribes, a conflict that has been around for over 28 years and has claimed the lives of some 84 people including 5 women, in addition to hundreds of injured people[2]. The fact that the two sides of the conflicts are relatives adds another dimension to the conflict that might be perceived as positive but continued conflict escalation cycle does not seem to support this very perception.

There are different stories about the reasons that led to the conflict and the complexities that are involved in it. Some claim that the conflict was created to weaken the tribes and others claim that political parties played around it. Many, including the sheikhs of the two tribes have put their own analysis and calculations. However, the voice of women remained unheard. I decided to take a step and learn about the conflict from a woman’s perspective.

Sheikha Sayedah Al-Ghanimiyah is the widow of the grand sheikh Ali Mohammed Al-Ukaimi, the grand sheikh of the Shulan tribe. At the same time she is the sister of Abdullah Al-Eragi, grand sheikh of the Hamdan tribe. Sheikha Sayedah finds herself caught in  the 28-year old very complicated tribal conflict that involves her brothers as one party of the conflict and her sons as the other.

A very powerful and charismatic woman in the beginning of her 50s, Sayedah grew up a female tribal leader, a Sheikha, in her family. She got married to a Saudi tribal leader, sheikh, from the Yam tribe. She stayed with him for 5 months, and then ran back to her tribe, pregnant. Her family did not mind her decision. “It is very normal in al-Jawf. If a woman doesn’t want a man anymore, she can simply dump him”, said Sayedah. Her ex-husband brought big tribal leaders to her family in an attempt to bring her back to him but eventually Sayedah got her divorce. His son stayed with her until he was 7 before his father took him.

Four years later, Sayyedah got married to the grand sheikh of the Shulan tribe, Ali Al-Ukaimi who was married to 7 women before her including her cousin. Although it was not their first marriage, the marriage ceremony was very big. She was carried on a camel convoy to her new house. Although under Islamic law and tribal tradition Sheikh Ukaimi could have had other wives, as he had in the years preceding his marriage to Sayedah, she remained his only wife until he died. Sayeda clearly adored her late husband and speaks of his courage and wisdom with great passion. She gave him 8 children, 5 girls and 3 boys. Her relationship with her cousin, ex-wife of her late husband is wonderful. “We are sisters” says Sayedah who speaks very well of her husband’s children and regard them her own. 


Torn in a tribal conflict:

The current grand sheikh of Hamdan is the immediate uncle of the current grand sheikh of Shulan. Sayeda’s niece from Hamdan is married to Rabee, the brother of grand sheikh of Shulan. The sister of the current sheikh of Shulan is married to a sheikh from Hamdan. In total, four women from the Sheikh family of Shulan are married to the sheikh of Hamdan and his sons. Sayeda is not just an ordinary woman living under the conflict. Her brother represents the Hamdan side of the conflict and her son represents the Shulan side of it. Both are the sheikhs of the two conflicting tribes.

Fighting over land and land resources were identified in a recent research to be the main reason  for conflict. A less frequent but still important cause of inter-tribal conflict is competition over government services was also found to be an important reason behind tribal conflicts. Lack of proper planning and implementation of development services without consulting with locals or without sensitivity to tribal conflicts helped spark or create conflicts.[3]  In the case of the conflict between Shulan and Hamdan, the conflict started more than 28 years ago when the government suddenly decided to dig a well within Shulan’s territory and chose an engineer from Hamdan to carry out the job. The grand sheikh of Shulan then asked the Hamdan to stop the digging or to move it 20 meters towards Hamdan. The contracted company refused. The Ukaimis from Shulan then fired at the Hamdani’s to protect the sovereignty of their land.

Two prominent Sheikhs from a neighboring governorate intervened to resolve the conflict. “Shulan honored[4] the verdict but Hamdan didn’t”, said Sayedah. Her late husband managed to keep the conflict at a minimum level for 15 years. He started implementing the land demarcation according to the verdict of the Arbitrators but he died before the job was finished. War broke again. When his son took over, peace treaties were observed and renewed for 10 years until he died. War broke again. His brother Ameen Al-Ukaimi took over 4 years ago but since he took over the conflict has escalated and war broke for the third time.

Sayeda’s son-in-law whom she calls son, named Ameen, the sheikh of Shulan and her brother Abdullah the sheikh of Hamdan have been trying ever since to resolve the conflict and stop the blood shed. Efforts have ranged between involving prominent tribal leaders to calling upon the President to intervene personally. More than one time her son Ameen (Shulan) and his immediate cousin Hassan (Hamdan) traveled to Sanaa[5] and shared a room in the jail in a desperate attempt to find a solution[6]. Two years ago Hassan and Ameen were both in Jail and were both determined to not go back to their areas until the state finds a solution to the conflict. Hassan suddenly left the jail and was shot in Sanaa shortly after that. The situation then escalated further.

“They shot Hassan because they want to undermine Ameen. They want to divide the Eragi and the Ukaimis so that they can get rid of the two Sheikhs” said Sayedah who believes that the conflict involves more than a fight over land or resources. She believes that there are “hidden hands” from the outside working to break the bond between the two strong tribes. Sayedah suspects that political parties play the game. She also suspects that there are big sheikhs who are playing behind the scene to weaken those Eragis and the Ukaimis who want a resolution for the conflict. She believes that those who stir the conflict are young men (Jefareen) who “get paid to do the killings” in order to maintain the war.

Sayedah who very much admire the commitment of her son-in-law believes that the problem is in Hamdan’s lack of commitment and inability of her brother to get his people commit to resolving the conflict. When a committee of tribal leaders was send by the president to mediate in the conflict a year ago, Ameen Al-Ukaimi told them that he would go to even accepting or paying blood money if that would end the conflict[7]. Sayedah thinks that the problem lies in the fact that the grand sheikh of Hamdan could not control his minor sheikhs. “Shulan authorized their Sheikh Ameen Al-Ukaimi and committed to obeying/living up to his decision while Hamdan failed to do so with their Sheikh Abdullah Al-Eragi” she said.

Sayedah is the “peace bird”. As a woman she has access to both tribes[8]. Sometimes she managed to get the two sides to at least stop fighting with heavy weapons. But then she believes that the complexities of the conflict are bigger than her and her two families.” The Eragi’s and Ukaimi’s are one family but then the Jefareen get paid by some to keep the conflict going on”.

Sayedah showed me around in her house. From the roof of her house I took pictures of the house of her brother and of the clear marks of bombs and heavy fires on the walls of the house and surrounding area. “I am in continuous pain and worry. My nephews and sons want to kill each other. If my son leaves the house in the morning I don’t expect him to come back, I worry that my family would kill him. If my brothers leave the house I expect my sons to kill them. I was in Sanaa for medical check ups for 5 days. All the time I was worried that my sons would get killed by their uncles” said Sayeda. “When there is firing my daughters and I stay inside and cry. There is simply nothing that we can do”.  

Sayedah knows very well how to use guns. “But I would never use it against my brothers”, said Sayedah. But her daughter karamah who is a school principle in Aljawf happened to carry the gun and shoot at the Hamdanis to support her brothers.

Sayedah’s Proposal to end the conflict:

In a phone conversation with the President Sayedah urged him to interfere personally to resolve the conflict. She respects President Saleh but she thinks that he simply could not control the trouble-makers in the conflicting tribes. Sayedah’s supports the proposal put forward earlier by her husband. She says that the President should stop payment of government salaries to the people of the two tribes till they agree to stop the fighting. Then he himself should send a committee of arbitrators who would set up a tent in the area over which the two tribes are fighting. The committee then should give a 1/3 of the land to the Hamdanis and 1/3 to the Shulani’s and make the 1/3 in the middle a government property. The government then should invest in that land.


Sayedah as a public figure:

It is true that Sayedah’s life with her husband gave her wider influence and social prestige and that she recognizes that. However, Sayeda believes that she was born as a sheikhah and talks with pride about her tribe. “I was a sheikha since I was born. You Ukaimis did not make me one” she says to her daughter who was asking her when she married her father indicating that it was the time when she became a sheikha.  

Very active in public life, Sayedah is the head of the ruling party branch in the governorate. She is also the Chairwoman of the Women’s Union Branch there and also she also runs a local women’s NGO. She has a say and influence. In 2003 she mobilized voters to vote for her cousin who is a ruling party candidate in the Hamdan Parliamentary Constituency against the wish of her son Ameen, Sheikh of Shulan, who wanted her to mobilize Hamdanis to vote for his fellow opposition candidate there[9]. “Ameen stopped visiting me for a year after that incident” said Sayedah with a smile.

She is a business woman. She owns a farm and runs the farm business herself and spends all revenues on poor people in her community. There are two doors in her house, one for men and one for women. The doors are open all the time in case people need to come.  “It is my husband’s will that we don’t shut the doors in the face of the needy and guests”, she said. Even when there is no man in the house, Sayedah and her daughters do their “duty” towards guests and the needy.

“Everyone respects Sayyedah. She comes from a very respectable family. Unlike women in this region, Sayedah understands politics and social life issues” Said Sheikh Ali Alajji, a tribal leader from Hamdan.

Sayedah is a role model. Women in the tribe follow her steps. She was asked by her son[10] who is the Sheikh of the Shulan to wear black gown and the veil outside the house. When she did so, the rest of the women in the village did the same.

She believes that the tribal conflict affects most the lives of women and children. “there are 20 widows and many orphans in Hamdan and more in Shulan”, she said. Conflict hinders boys and girls education. Her own daughter could not attend to school for 2 years because of the conflict.

Sayeda’s believes that education and work are basic rights for women. Her daughters are all educated. One of them is a school principle. Another one is a teacher and the rest are still in high school. She always encourages her children not to have many kids in order to be able to raise them well.


A message from the Sheikhah under fire:

Sayedah lives in a house that lies under bombing with heavy weapons most of the nights. Marks of bombs and Bazookas are all over the house, some she renovated, some she turned into small windows and others remained as they are. From her roof in Shulan, I could clearly see the houses of her brothers and family in Hamdan and I could see the zone they are fighting over. I don’t want money, I don’t want anything. I just want peace between my sons and my brothers”, she said.













[1] Forty night to 60 percent of the populations in the governorate are poor  according to Yemen Poverty Assessment, 2007. can be seen at  http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTYEMEN/Resources/310077-1197206771664/Volume_I_Main_Report.pdf
[2] An interview with Ameen Al-Ukaimi, grand sheikh of Shulan in alwasat newspaper
[3] NDI, 2007
[4] To honor the verdict means to accept it and show commitment to implement it.
[5] Sanaa is the capital of YEMEN.
[6] It has been a tradition the government uses with tribes that it put the sheikhs of conflicting tribes in the jail to force them to stop fighting and commit to arbitration. In the case of this conflict, the Sheikhs themselves requested that they stay in jail until the president does a serious business to end the conflict.
[7] According to tribal culture, it is a big shame to take blood money from the perpetrator or his tribe. Ukaimi’s willingness to do that demonstrates his desperation to end the conflict even at the expense of violating such a cultural rule.
[8] According to tribal culture women and children and old people have access to any place during wars. Killing a woman even by mistake is considered a black shame and takes heavy penalties that can reach 44 folds of blood money of a man.
[9] GPC is the ruling party in Yemen and Islah is the Islamist and biggest opposition party. Shulan and Hamdan have different parliamentary constituencies.
[10] He is the son-in-law to Sayedah but she likes to call him my son.